🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from disorder. While he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this same narrative instead of debunking it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• The shortlist included several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the process said the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it might seek to examine.