🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.