🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.